Another test of perception – but this time, you can judge mine, and my photo-cheating skills, as well.
Happy foam figure © SB |
It’s a fascinating shape, and I wanted to cut it from the water so I could play with it. Of course, tracing requires excellent fine-motor skills, which it could be argued that I do not have. (Perhaps it's patience I lack, although given the time I've spent so far on this exercise, I doubt it...)
I'm fascinated by how the editing changes the creature’s character.
No longer a blithe spirit, there is something greedily disturbing about the foam's air- and water-skimming clones.
Dragons over Wascana Creek © SB |
~~~~~
My result, however, owes little to Moore’s rounded, minimalist style or Caplin's expertise, and much to my love of detail and lack of skill – and perhaps, my youth spent reading comic books and science fiction.
In any case, Caplin says isolated objects work best in realistic settings; that's why I chose this picture of the bridge and the old willow for the dragon fly-bys.
And yes, I know – flight may not be realistic for water creatures spawned from foam.
So what about my new friend as a statue in the park? I think it would be great in a fire-hued bronze, with perhaps one bit erased in the name of public decency, recognizing the unlikelihood of city committees sanctioning appendages of nude male aliens in this city's parks...
New statue in Les Sherman Park. © SB |
I need to work on edges. Perspective. Shadows. Subtle effects.
~~~~
No comments:
Post a Comment